The TV announcers kept talking about what a good game the UNC at Virginia game was. And I normally like lower scoring, fewer possession games. But this was not a good game.
It was a good 62-56 win for the Tar Heels, who rallied from 11 down in the second half to win a road game to start the ACC season. But this was not a good game.
This was a game that was tied with 2:56 to go and was a one-point game with 38 seconds to go. But this was not a good game.
Neither team shot very well. And while it was close at the end, the game didn't really seem close throughout. Carolina had a big lead early and Virginia had a big lead in the second half.
The 12-minute stretch during the middle of the game when Carolina scored just two points was like watching paint dry. Despite the futility, the Cavaliers came out of the 12 minutes with only an eight-point lead.
The game did show that Carolina can hit free throws - especially with John Henson on the bench as the Heels canned 14 of their last 16 from the line.
And the game did show that this Carolina team, when it gets behind, is tougher than last year's team. This team is willing to grind it out and keep playing its game until something breaks for them.
For more on the Virginia game, please click here.
Saturday, January 8, 2011
Friday, January 7, 2011
UNC team pranksters sticky note John Henson's entire car
With a little time on their hands during break, the North Carolina Tar Heel players have been pulling pranks on one another.One of the latest comes at the hands of the subs who come in at the end of games to mop up to a chorus of "shoot, shoot" from the Carolina students living out their George Plimpton-like dreams. The victim was John Henson whose car was covered with 2400 sticky notes. Click here for video.
The players - Daniel Bolick, Stewart Cooper, DJ Johnston, Patrick Crouch and David Dupont - have dubbed themselves "Blue Steel." Henson thought the culprits were Larry Drew and Justin Watts who had earlier been the victims of pranks themselves.
A retaliation attack of cotton balls, baby powder and Saran Wrap was made on Johnston's car today.
Players and coaches alike seem to have enjoyed the hijinks and say that this team has good chemistry. The Tar Heels take on Virginia to open the ACC season at noon
Saturday.
Title IX investigations are generally a waste of time and money
Just nine months ago the feds closed an 18-month case against the Orange County Schools for supposedly shortchanging girls athletic teams. The U.S. Office for Civil Rights investigated gender equity in the district's athletics programs and found the complaint to be groundless. Again, it took a year and a half for them to investigate and find the complaint groundless.
Now the feds are coming after the Wake County Schools based on an accusation from the National Women’s Law Center that Wake and 11 other school systems across the country have failed to provide high school girls with equal opportunities as boys to play interscholastic sports.
Title IX was a commendable venture when it started in 1972. There were few opportunities for girl athletes. Now that there are lots of opportunities, radical feminist groups like the National Women's Law Center are unnecessarily politicizing Title IX and pushing it to the extremes.
What they and the feds don't want to admit is that men and women are different. While women outnumber men about 60 percent to 40 percent in society, men care more about athletics in general than women. They watch sports more and they play sports more. They have more interest in sports and they are generally better at sports than women. Take the best male athlete and the best female athlete in any sport and compare.
Colleges are especially hurt by Title IX today. Many more women are attending universities today than they did in 1972. So, the percentage of women's teams have had to increase yet men remain more interested in athletics than women. Over a 15-year period in the '90s and '2000s, something like 6,000 opportunities for women were added while something like 20,000 opportunities for men were lost.
Schools are forced to field women's teams at the expense of men's teams because of overzealous social engineering. Benefitting a handful of female students at the expense of a bunch of male students doesn't seem fair to me. And Title IX was meant to be about fairness, wasn't it?
Fielding women's teams where there is no wide interest of potential players or little interest of fans creates a financial burden on athletic budgets.
If a high school or college has 60 percent females, do they really need 60 percent of the athletic opportunites? If you take 100 women and 100 men and ask them about their interests, I bet more than 90 percent of the men would include sports in their first two or three interests whereas I bet the number of women including sports would be half that, especially when you are talking about playing sports. Yet females have to have more of the sports opportunities?
A 10-year-old case against the Tacoma, Wash. school district has been recently settled. Someone wasn't happy that while the school district had 51 percent males, 57 percent of athletes in the district were males. Today, athletic participation by males is 50 percent. So, you would think that men and women are equally interested in sports. In order to placate the feds, girls' teams are now fielded in water polo, wrestling and, get this, bowling. There are 12 girls' athletic teams now and 10 boys' athletic teams. Really? So, are girls now suddenly more interested in sports than boys?
I haven't seen the big drumbeat for women's wrestling but I guess if you dress 'em up like the ones on TV, you'll at least have some male fans showing up to watch.
At my son's preschool, not one teacher or administrator is male. I assume this is because of a disproportionate interest of females to have those jobs and not some plot against men. But maybe I should call the feds in for an 18-month investigation just to make sure.
Now the feds are coming after the Wake County Schools based on an accusation from the National Women’s Law Center that Wake and 11 other school systems across the country have failed to provide high school girls with equal opportunities as boys to play interscholastic sports.
Title IX was a commendable venture when it started in 1972. There were few opportunities for girl athletes. Now that there are lots of opportunities, radical feminist groups like the National Women's Law Center are unnecessarily politicizing Title IX and pushing it to the extremes.
What they and the feds don't want to admit is that men and women are different. While women outnumber men about 60 percent to 40 percent in society, men care more about athletics in general than women. They watch sports more and they play sports more. They have more interest in sports and they are generally better at sports than women. Take the best male athlete and the best female athlete in any sport and compare.
Colleges are especially hurt by Title IX today. Many more women are attending universities today than they did in 1972. So, the percentage of women's teams have had to increase yet men remain more interested in athletics than women. Over a 15-year period in the '90s and '2000s, something like 6,000 opportunities for women were added while something like 20,000 opportunities for men were lost.
Schools are forced to field women's teams at the expense of men's teams because of overzealous social engineering. Benefitting a handful of female students at the expense of a bunch of male students doesn't seem fair to me. And Title IX was meant to be about fairness, wasn't it?
Fielding women's teams where there is no wide interest of potential players or little interest of fans creates a financial burden on athletic budgets.
If a high school or college has 60 percent females, do they really need 60 percent of the athletic opportunites? If you take 100 women and 100 men and ask them about their interests, I bet more than 90 percent of the men would include sports in their first two or three interests whereas I bet the number of women including sports would be half that, especially when you are talking about playing sports. Yet females have to have more of the sports opportunities?
A 10-year-old case against the Tacoma, Wash. school district has been recently settled. Someone wasn't happy that while the school district had 51 percent males, 57 percent of athletes in the district were males. Today, athletic participation by males is 50 percent. So, you would think that men and women are equally interested in sports. In order to placate the feds, girls' teams are now fielded in water polo, wrestling and, get this, bowling. There are 12 girls' athletic teams now and 10 boys' athletic teams. Really? So, are girls now suddenly more interested in sports than boys?
I haven't seen the big drumbeat for women's wrestling but I guess if you dress 'em up like the ones on TV, you'll at least have some male fans showing up to watch.
At my son's preschool, not one teacher or administrator is male. I assume this is because of a disproportionate interest of females to have those jobs and not some plot against men. But maybe I should call the feds in for an 18-month investigation just to make sure.
Thursday, January 6, 2011
Panthers should take Clemson DE Bowers
Now that Andrew Luck is out of the picture for the Carolina Panthers, the top choice in the NFL Draft should be a player familiar to football fans here - Da'Quan Bowers of Clemson.
Bowers is 6 feet 4 and 280 pounds and one of the few elite rushers expected to be available in the draft. Carolina has the No. 1 pick, and we're not fans of NFL teams drafting local guys to sell tickets. After a game or two, all that wears off. But getting Julius Peppers with the second pick overall was a perfect example of a local guy - UNC - who also fit the need of the region's team.
Carolina is in the same boat now. Peppers joined a downtrodden team and helped turn it into a winner. Bowers is as destructive a force on defense as the ACC has seen since Peppers, and he'd help the Panthers right away.
On offense, it remains true that Carolina is going to have to find out if Jimmy Clausen can win in the NFL after all. The Panthers have a horrible offense, with Steve Smith and the offensive line declining. But defense is an even more urgent problem. Charles Johnson had 11.5 sacks for Carolina at one end, but he has little help. Adding Bowers would be a start toward respectability on defense, and a great defense always has been the foundation of Carolina's best teams.
Bowers is 6 feet 4 and 280 pounds and one of the few elite rushers expected to be available in the draft. Carolina has the No. 1 pick, and we're not fans of NFL teams drafting local guys to sell tickets. After a game or two, all that wears off. But getting Julius Peppers with the second pick overall was a perfect example of a local guy - UNC - who also fit the need of the region's team.
Carolina is in the same boat now. Peppers joined a downtrodden team and helped turn it into a winner. Bowers is as destructive a force on defense as the ACC has seen since Peppers, and he'd help the Panthers right away.
On offense, it remains true that Carolina is going to have to find out if Jimmy Clausen can win in the NFL after all. The Panthers have a horrible offense, with Steve Smith and the offensive line declining. But defense is an even more urgent problem. Charles Johnson had 11.5 sacks for Carolina at one end, but he has little help. Adding Bowers would be a start toward respectability on defense, and a great defense always has been the foundation of Carolina's best teams.
Pack basketball living dangerously with slow starts
This is the year of living dangerously for the N.C. State men's basketball team. The Wolfpack beat Elon 87-72 Wednesday night at the Greensboro Coliseum, but it was another game in which State was behind and in trouble.
We take plays off," freshman guard Ryan Harrow told Pack Pride. "That's what we have to get better at."
Harrow made a great point. If you look at the Pack's performance so far, what you see is a good record but one built on uneven performances:
* State beat Tennessee Tech in the opener 82-69 but led just 37-34 at halftime.
* State trailed ECU 23-22 but won,85-65
* State was down 56-55 to George Mason before winning, 78-65
* State led Fairleigh Dickinson by just four points in the second half before winning, 77-67
* State had a slow start against USC Upstate before winning 79-60
* State trailed Youngstown State 31-13 before winning, 67-50
* State needed a last-second shot to beat Delaware State 72-70
* State trailed Elon by 10 in the first half before winning, 87-72
Now, is any single game there indicative of disaster? Of course not. But slow starts are going to hard to overcome in places like Clemson and Virginia, let alone Duke and UNC. State has an easy ACC opener Saturday against Wake Forest - of course, the Pack could turn that into a cliff-hanger - and the schedule gets tougher after that.
This is a young team, and one that will grow. But, whew, you just wonder what ACC play holds if the Wolfpack continues to start so slowly. The larger question that looms over the program is whether this coaching staff has the team ready to play. A few slow starts is one thing - a pattern of behavior is another.
We take plays off," freshman guard Ryan Harrow told Pack Pride. "That's what we have to get better at."
Harrow made a great point. If you look at the Pack's performance so far, what you see is a good record but one built on uneven performances:
* State beat Tennessee Tech in the opener 82-69 but led just 37-34 at halftime.
* State trailed ECU 23-22 but won,85-65
* State was down 56-55 to George Mason before winning, 78-65
* State led Fairleigh Dickinson by just four points in the second half before winning, 77-67
* State had a slow start against USC Upstate before winning 79-60
* State trailed Youngstown State 31-13 before winning, 67-50
* State needed a last-second shot to beat Delaware State 72-70
* State trailed Elon by 10 in the first half before winning, 87-72
Now, is any single game there indicative of disaster? Of course not. But slow starts are going to hard to overcome in places like Clemson and Virginia, let alone Duke and UNC. State has an easy ACC opener Saturday against Wake Forest - of course, the Pack could turn that into a cliff-hanger - and the schedule gets tougher after that.
This is a young team, and one that will grow. But, whew, you just wonder what ACC play holds if the Wolfpack continues to start so slowly. The larger question that looms over the program is whether this coaching staff has the team ready to play. A few slow starts is one thing - a pattern of behavior is another.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
